DISCLAIMER: Please be advised that this transcription was done from a audio recording by an
out of house service; therefore the accuracy of the transcript may be impacted. If there is an issue
Manhattan Neighborhood Network in partnership with Gotham Gazette and the
League of Women Voters of New York State, presents Race 2 Represent, a MNN
election initiative. Hello, I'm Ben Max, Executive Editor of Gotham Gazette. New Yorkers will be
voting in the general election on Tuesday November 6th. They will be casting
their ballots for offices including governor, lieutenant governor, attorney
general, state senate, state assembly, and state comptroller.
Today, we bring you a debate with the candidates running for New York State
Comptroller. The winner will take office in January of 2019. The comptroller's
office has wide reaching powers, crucial to the fiscal wellbeing of New York. It
manages the 200 plus billion dollar state pension fund, audit state agencies and
state contracts, reports on state finances, and oversees the economic affairs of
city governments, including New York City.
Joining us today is the Democratic Candidate, Tom DiNapoli, the incumbent, the
Green Party Candidate, Mark Dunlea. The Libertarian Candidate Cruger
Gallaudet, and the Republican Candidate, Jonathan Trichter. Welcome, thank
you all for being here, we're gonna get started. The first question we're gonna
start with you Comptroller DiNapoli, and move to my right. The first question is,
how do you describe the job you're applying for, or your case, reapplying for,
the job of New York State Comptroller?
Well, I think it's the best job in the state government, that's why it's been a
privilege for me to serve in this position, I hope I have a chance to do it for
It's really the office that promotes accountability and transparency in state
government and in local government as well. I don't have a vote, I don't make
any decisions on how the money's spent but I do have a voice. And the
comptroller exercises have voice through our budget reports or analysis of state
fiscal practices, our evaluation of local government finances with our audits.
Where for state government, local government, we do promote the tax payer
And in New York we have another added responsibility, a little different than
some other states, where I serve as trustee for the New York common
retirement fund, that's the fund that provides the retirement for 1.1 million
New Yorkers who are either retired public workers or public workers who look
forward to be retired one day.
So there's a broad range of responsibilities, a lot of it has to do with the back
office operation of the state contracts, approving payments and so on. But
we've been an effective partner in keeping New York moving forward and I want
to continue to do that. Look out for the tax payer interest and make New York
an even better state than it is already.
Okay, thank you, Mr. Dunlea, how do you describe the job of state comptroller?
Well I think Tom has done a fairly good job outlining the present responsibilities
of state comptroller. I would like to change that a bit, I think the state
comptroller needs to be the fiscal watch dog for the state to make sure the
money's being spent properly and wisely. I think there needs to be a more
aggressive effort by the state comptroller to crack down on corruption within
the state government which is quite pervasive.
I think we need to particularly go after both the state authorities and their
incurrent of debt and their improper expenditure practices. But the main reason
I personally am running, is because for the last five years I've worked with
350.org, to try to get institutions in New York state and around the world to
divest from fossil fuels.
We've managed to divest seven trillion dollars from a thousand institutions
because of the role of climate change. Earlier this year we were able to convince
New York city to divest from fossil fuels, we did get Governor Cromo to agree to
support state divestment, did manage to get about 50 state legislators to co
sponsor legislation I helped write.
But I've not been able to convince Tom yet to divest our state pension fund and
if we divested a decade ago, we'd have about 22 billion dollars more money in
the state pension fund, so that's one of the things I'd like to protect tax payers
from is the impact of climate change.
Okay, thank you. Mr. Gallaudet, how do you describe the role that you're
Well first of all, I just want to point out I'm not a politician. I'm from the private
sector, I have an MBA, my first job was as an auditor for General Electric, so I
actually have experience auditing other organizations. But like a true politician I
may not answer the question that you ask because I'm here really to convince
people to vote libertarian.
Particularly on the comptrollers job because libertarians I think are probably the
most fiscally responsible party on the planet. And if you want to split your ticket,
this would be a good place to do it, because we've had Mr. DiNapoli in there for
quite a few years, if you want change, I think vote for me. If you want change in
general, vote libertarian.
I will elaborate more on my thoughts about why you should vote the libertarian
ticket and I will reserve that for another question that you ask that I probably
Okay. Mr. Trichter, how do you describe the role of the job that you're applying
As the most powerful, underappreciated and under utilized office in New York
state. It is the top watch dog and chief fiscal officer of New York, the job
shouldn't be held by a politician, it should be run by a professional. It's supposed
to police Albany and Albany Excess, and Albany politicians, and instead the
office has been held by Albany politicians.
I covered the office as a public finance investment banker at JP Morgan where I
had a private sector view to the previous comptroller who was a long time
Albany hand and was then hauled off to prison, and to fill that vacancy, the
current comptroller, Tom, sitting to my right, was hand selected by Shelley
Silver over the objection of every editorial board in New York state because as
the governor of his own party said at the time, he is totally and thoroughly
And he has since returned the favor to the state legislature, who appointed him
to uphold and strengthen the status quo in Albany at the expense of ordinary
New Yorkers and all the good that this office could do, was ordinary New
Yorkers. The powers of the office are formidable. He's the sole trustee of a $200
billion dollar pension fund.
It's a market power of a Saudi prince. And this comptroller has basically covered
up his pension performance and his investment performance, which he has
underperformed to the tune of $65 billion dollars and made up for in taxes,
local taxes. The reason that New York state's localities taxed so much, property
taxes are so high, are due to two things, Medicaid and pension costs.
Pension under performance by the sole trustee of it's pension fund, Tom
DiNapoli. There are two or three other incredibly powerful tools the comptroller
has that could disrupt the status quo and fix many of the vexing fiscal problems
that government groups wring their hands over and struggle with figuring out
how to amend. And I'm telling you the comptroller can do it single handedly and
unilaterally, and he's not.
We'll get back to some of those issues. I'm going to move on to a second
question. But first Comptroller DiNapoli, Mr. Trichter said a few things about
you, give you a few seconds to respond to anything you want to there.
Well now I understand why Jonathan's running, he views himself as being a
Saudi prince. And he's using his very effective career of being a political
operative largely for democratic candidates over many, many years, that's really
what his bio indicates. A lot of exaggerations, a lot of misunderstanding and
misrepresentation of my record and of the office.
I'm very proud of the fact that I became comptroller because a bipartisan
coalition of legislators want to restore integrity to this office, and I'm very proud
that I was elected by the people in 2010 and 2014, with most of the editorial
boards endorsing me when they saw my performance. So I have a record that I'm very proud of and that I'm proud to stand on.
So let's move on to the second question, which is, now that we've described the
role a little bit and some of you got into some of the answers to this next
question, but what are your specific qualifications for the role?
And of course Comptroller DiNapoli, you're reapplying, so you could talk a little
bit about what you think your accomplishments are, but for those in the
challenger seats, what makes you qualified to fill this role? We're going to start
with you Mr. Gallaudet, what are your qualifications to become state
You want honesty? Not a whole lot. I've got an MBA, I've been in the private
sector for a long time, I was with General Electric, I was an auditor, so I'm
probably the only person on the stage that has actually performed an audit. But
I have no, I've held no political office other than the Board of Education at
But what I would bring is a fresh pair of eyes on the whole job, the whole point
of the comptroller's job, why does New York have such a huge pension fund?
Why are we managing it? Could it be done differently? Also the whole issue of
who's controlling the comptroller?
He reports to no one. There's not accountability. So that can lead to corruption
and graft, I'm not saying that it's happened but that's a possibility. Anyways, so
my qualifications would be a fresh pair of eyes plus as I say, I think the voters
should vote libertarian right across the ticket.
We're going to come back in a minute to ask you a little bit more about what a
libertarian approach to being comptroller would be, but first, Mr. Trichter your
So, I'm a public finance and public pension expert. I served as a public finance
investment banker at JP Morgan. I then ran a municipal restructuring line of
business for a restructuring firm, and in that capacity I was tapped by Pew
Charitable Trusts to help lead a swat team of pension professionals that ran
around the country to apply reforms and assistance to struggling pension funds
around the USA.
And in that capacity I also lead the most comprehensive restructuring of a public
safety pension plan in Jacksonville, Florida. And I rely on those laurels. On top of
that, I am a lifelong democrat, who nevertheless was tapped and asked by the
republican party and the conservative party of New York to run in their line due
to my qualifications and expertise, I was given a dispensation, something they
called a Wilson Pakula, and it's the first time that the republicans gave such a
dispensation to a state wide candidate since 1970.
I like to think it's because of my qualifications and deep background and
expertise in public finance, in public pensions and my success in restructuring a
public safety plan in Jacksonville, Florida. At the time, one of the few successful
and maybe still, one of the only successful comprehensive restructuring of a
struggling public pension plans in America.
And as you mentioned, you have been a democrat until seeking this position
and as Mr. DiNapoli noted, you've worked on some campaigns, including for
democrats, what has that experience taught you and prepared you for this role?
Well I hope it's not a critique Tom, I hope you don't hold it against me that I've
worked for democrats before. I've worked for fiscally reasonable and pragmatic
democrats. I myself am a fiscally pragmatic individual and would take that
approach to the comptroller's office, only in New York does that make you a
fiscal conservative, if you can actually do math and balance budgets.
And I could talk at length about the comptroller's performance which he claims
to be par excellence, and talks about his own editorial endorsements, but may I
also point out that in 2010, every newspaper in the state endorsed his opponent
other than News Day, his hometown paper. I'm not sure what he's talking about
when he speaks about…
We're going to get into that, into some of that rector and start right now
obviously with Mr. DiNapoli, your chance to talk about your accomplishments.
It was more than News Day, and you know I report to the people of the state of
New York and that's who the ultimate boss is for the comptroller and for an
elected official like this. And unlike John, I have my values as a democrat, and
I've stuck with them all my life, I grew up in a good republican household, but I'm a democrat.
And in Trump's America, to become a republican after you've been a democrat all these years and to sign onto the republican agenda and the conservative party agenda. Does that mean John, that you've agreed now not to be pro choice on a woman's right to choose and control her own body? Marriage equality? Those are the kind of values that the conservative party stands for. If you had to sell yourself to get a nomination, I don't think that's the best standard to be running for office.
I have a clear record, like Mr. Gallaudet, I was a school board member for ten years, I began as a local official, elected 11 times to the state assembly representing my community, served on the assembly ways committee, Ways of Means committee, the fiscal committee for the assembly, and I've done the job since 2007, restoring the integrity to the office, managing through tough fiscal times, the Great Recession, growing the pension fund to be at a record all time high, and Pew has acknowledged that we are one of only four state pension plans in the country that is over 90% funded. That is an enviable record.
Okay, thank you. We're going to come back to you in just a minute but we're going to let Mr. Dunlea talk about his qualifications for the job.
Well, unlike John or Tom, I'm agreeing, I'm not a democrat. As a student at Albany Law School and RPI, I started the New York Public Interest Research Group and I've had many decades of work. I probably have testified on the state budget more than any other person running for state office at this point.
I graduated the top of my class at RPI, management at Albany Law School, I focused on issues of taxation and corporations because I assume I'd be competing on that issue once I graduated from law school. I was an elected town board member in my town, I'm probably one of the few elected officials who can say every year I've been in office, I cut taxes.
And one of the things I did is I put all the town contracts out to bid, one of the results of that was at the county democratic chairperson ended up in federal prison for two years because it turned out he was skimming money off of our town insurance contract before I got here.
I was 22 years old the first time I was involved in litigations, suing over how government in this case, New York state and Albany county were circumventing the restrictions on current of public debt. I wrote the law that gave tax payers the right to sue over a legal expenditure of tax payers funds when I was a law student.
I was one of the co founders of the Fiscal Policy Institute, I spent many years doing things that just promoting legislation to curb the abuses in the economic development program.
Okay, we're going to start with you Mr. Trichter, this round and if you want to take a moment to respond to Mr. DiNapoli's comments about your beliefs and switching your party under President Trump from democratic to republican, you can do that.
Yeah, it's time DiNapoli wants to run against-
Let me ask the question and you can start there and then move into your answer to the question, this question will go to everybody but you first Mr. Trichter. And this is about perhaps the most powerful aspect of this job as some of you have mentioned which is management and being the sole trustee of the public pension fund that's valued over $200 billion dollars, how you would approach that awesome responsibility as comptroller if elected or re-elected. Mr. Trichter.
Sorry for interrupting. So if Tom wants to run against Donald Trump, as he's running for re-election for comptroller, he's more than welcome to, but I'm running for a professional office which requires a private sector set of skills including being responsible for investing over $200 billion dollars in public assets. Now Tom DiNapoli has basically misrepresented his own performance investing those funds. His expectation was to earn 7.5% over the 11 years he's been in office.
He's only earned 6%. And the difference, the delta between his expectations and what he's earned translates into $65 billion dollars in under performance. He's had to make up for that $65 billion dollars in debt by taxing New York localities, and he's done it very aggressively.
The state comptroller has siphoned up local tax dollars ten times more than localities around the countries have for their own public pension problems and under performance.
So, what I would do is I would invest the public pension assets passively in S&P Indexes, the equity portfolio, and by doing that I could basically ban hedge funds and private equity, and this man, this Tom DiNapoli, the state comptroller, has spent over, and paid over $6 billion dollars in fees to hedge fund managers and other alternative fund managers since he's been in office.
I call him the $6 billion dollar man. If it sounds like a lot, it's only because it is. The alternative asset portfolio of the pension fund under DiNapoli, has underperformed.
So he's paid $6 billion dollars to hedge funds for under performance, whereas
he would have done much better for New York retirees had he passively
invested the equity portfolio in S&P Indexes. That $6 billion dollars should be
retirees. Not hedge fund managers.
So we're going to come to you Comptroller DiNapoli, to discuss your
management and being the sole trustee of the pension fund.
It's been excellent and it's been strong, I don't know if I have the time to
respond to everything Jonathan has said, but he doesn't put that footnote in
about the global financial crisis that happened during my ten year. I don't think
he's suggesting I'm responsible for it, perhaps he is.
When you consider our performance even with that year in the ten year look
back, 11 year look back, it's an excellent performance. My obligation ultimately
is to the members of the system, that's my fiduciary responsibility. And that
means our goal is to have a smart investment strategy but also to make sure we
don't fall behind on funding our pensions.
You look at the states that are in bad shape, very often they're in bad budget
condition or fiscal condition because their pensions are poorly funded. They
haven't paid the bill. Well we have, that's why we are now 98% funded. And we
have been ahead of other pension funds in being more conservative in our
outlook. Now down to 7% long term assumed rate of return.
And the strength is the diversification of our portfolio, to put all of our money in
index funds would be totally irresponsible. To put all your eggs in one basket, if
we didn't learn anything from the global financial crisis, you have to be
diversified. Is there a premium when you put some money into the alternatives?
But we went form $109 billion at the depths of the global financial crisis, now
we're $209 billion. So I'm, the $100 billion man, not the $6 billion man.
Your liabilities are $241 billion Tom, so you're $200 billion dollars but you've got
$241 of liabilities.
And just on this issue of, excuse me, on this issue of the fees to hedge fund, you
say that sometimes to diversify that comes with the territory.
And so you feel comfortable about continuing that if re-elected?
Well we're always looking to negotiate for better fees, and in some of the higher
fee areas, like hedge funds, we've been reducing our allocation significantly.
We also have most of our public equities invested passively through index that are internally managed, so we actually are more efficient than many other public pension funds with our public equities.
So when we pay the fees for the alternatives, we feel it does balance out because it gives us the strength of diversification. You take something like hedge funds, they actually perform better in that year of great collapse than the public equity.
So if we had all our eggs in the public equity basket in the year that the markets tanked, we really would still be digging out from under it today.
You'll have a chance to get back into the mix here but Mr.Dunlea, how would you approach this position managing the massive pension fund?
Well I usually like to remind both voters and my opponents apparently that… to the state constitution, public pensions are treated as a contractual obligation.
So it's really the tax payers that are at risk more than the employees. I happen to be a beneficiary of the fund through my wife, as I said earlier, if the state had divested as we had asked a decade ago from fossil fuels, the pension fund would have an extra 22 billion dollars, about $20,000.00 per member of the pension fund.
I do agree we need a cut, the fees we're paying for outside consultants, particularly because we are following so much of the index of the fund, I do applaud Tom for divesting the state pension fund from private prison, I think that was the correct decision, I'm a little bit confused though if we can divest from private pensions, why we cannot apply the same thing to companies that are literally destroying the planet.
The IPCC put out a report yesterday saying that we have 12 years to completely end the use of fossil fuels. When the world is saying that an industry has to end, that's not a wise financial investment to continue somewhere between $6 to $11 billion dollars.
We're going to give Comptroller DiNapoli a chance to respond on that, but anything else in your last 15 seconds, anything else about the managing the pension fund as comptroller that you want to highlight for voters? Is there any other priorities you would have?
Well I do think, the statutory responsibilities of trying to get 8% rate of return, I understand we're about 5.7 over the last decade, I would like certainly to try to bump that up a bit.
Okay. Mr. Gallaudet managing the pension fund as a sole trustee, any priorities
if you were elected?
Well one, I don't like the concept of being a sole trustee, so I would encourage
the legislature to pass some sort of act that would create maybe a board that
oversees the pension fund rather than just having a sole trustee. One thing I
learned at GE is nothing is sacred.
GE would take a look at everything, question whether it even has a right to
exist, force their managers to justify why they're doing what they're doing. So I
think that would be my outlook going in, why and how and what is this pension
fund, it's huge, why does one person have so much control over one chunk of
Okay, Comptroller DiNapoli, let's come back to you on divestment from fossil
fuels, what has been your approach to that, anything you would do differently
in another term?
Sure, first of all, it's kind of an overstatement to say one person is in charge of
all of it. In fact, we have a very elaborate system with internal staff, external
advisors, advisory committees, I can assure you, the pension fund is not
managed based on what I think when I wake up in the morning and read the
Wall Street Journal.
I agree with Mark. Climate is a serious issue, or at least of our time, it's a
material risk to our portfolio. We have been a very aggressive pension fund in
assessing that risk. We've been recognized by the asset owners disclosure
project which evaluates how institutional investors are dealing with the climate
We are ranked number three globally, number one in the country as investors
that incorporate assessing climate risk in our portfolio decisions. So we have
been very clear that we want to invest proactively in the emerging low carbon
and green economy. We have a $7 billion dollar sustainability allocation of our
pension fund, we trail blazed the low emission index which I think has been a
very positive contribution.
Climate's a big issue. And just selling stock in the fossil fuel companies is not
going to solve it. A lot of New Yorkers are still driving cars with gasoline. Many
people have their homes heated with natural gas or with oil. Many people in the
city are on a bus that uses natural gas. A lot of transitions that have to happen.
Meaning it's still good investment.
Well, meaning that we have to go through a societal change and that for now in
the short run we still are making money from the oil and gas stocks. But we
want to use our voice as a shareholder to press, because corporations have to
be part of the solution. Just taking your voice away by selling all your shares is
not necessarily the best way to do that.
We have filed and we will continue to file shareholder resolutions to hold these
companies accountable. How are you assessing what your greenhouse gas
emissions are? How are you reducing those emissions or eliminating those
emissions? And fossil fuel companies are just part of it.
What about utilities, transportation, agriculture? This constant focus just on
selling oil and gas stocks I think misses the broader picture of what we all have
to do. On top of that we have a de carbonization panel that's been meeting, I'm
waiting for their recommendations.
Perhaps they'll suggest there are some companies we should in fact move away
from. But we want to do it in a thoughtful way. Why? We have to worry about
the bottom line protecting the interests of the members, the employees, the
retirees, and ultimately the taxpayers as well.
Okay, so we're going to move on to another of the main powers of the state
comptroller, and that is the power to conduct audits, and the responsibility to
conduct audits. So we're going to start with you Mr. Dunlea on this. How would
you approach that? How do you think the current comptroller has done with his
power to audit and what would you do differently?
Well you're correct that the audit is a very powerful tool, I think we need to be
more aggressive about examining pay to play contracts as you may know, right
before we did the Buffalo Billion situation where the governors top staff person
was convicted of rigging a $750 million dollar bid.
The Governor actually took away the power of the state comptroller to oversee
those type of contracts. I think any contract given to individuals, agencies, that
involve somebody who's made a campaign contribution, should receive
One audit that I did convince Tom's staff to do was to audit the issue of wage
step in the New York State Labor Department. We gladly agreed that the New
York State Labor Department was not doing an adequate job, we disagree what
they didn't really take the steps needed to correct the problem, a billion dollars
is stolen annually from people on low wages, and yet the State Labor
Department's only collecting $22 million.
One audit I would do based on my 28 years working at the Hunger Action
Network, I would really audit local departments, social services at the county
level, they routinely fail to provide benefits to people that are entitled to it. And
that is why we're feeding three million people out of food pantries and soup
kitchens across the state.
Okay. Mr. Gallaudet, the power to audit.
It's obviously a very powerful tool. I'm the only auditor on the stage so I suppose
that gives me the best qualifications for this job. But yeah, we can audit villages,
towns, cities I believe and I think we should use it, use it carefully, don't want to
become overbearing, but I would use it to reduce a scope of government. We
have something like 700 authorities, why do we need all these authorities? So
my primary goal would be to rationalize the government, make sense out of it,
why do we have so many authorities? Why do we have so many rules and
regulations? And one of the things I just want to point out here on the stage is
that there's this fighting between democrats and republicans that we constantly
see, beating each other up, Trump vs. Clinton, all this kind of stuff, so this is one
of the ways I'm not answering your question directly, but I think the libertarian
party is the most potential for becoming a major third party in this country.
That's why I think voters should really look at our ticket in New York and just
look at us as a national entity.
Okay. Mr. Trichter on the comptroller's power to audit state agencies and
authorities and towns and villages and such, how would you use that power?
Yeah, I will answer that question. And first I just want to point out though, that
of course Tom DiNapoli's not responsible for the Great Recession. However, he
underperformed other large pension funds over the same period, including the
Great Recession. So he performed worse than other pension funds. As for hedge
funds, providing a hedge on the poor performance during the Great Recession,
over the 11 years you've been in office Tom, your hedge fund portfolio has
performed less than 1%. And they've charged you $6 billion dollars for the
privilege. So I really don't know what you're talking about when you're talking
about the hedge.
Let's move on to the audit power please.
The broad constitutional authority of the state comptroller to audit every state
agency, every state entity and every public authority is tremendous. It's also one
of the more powerful roles of the office. It is the comptroller's responsibility for
instance to audit the MTA, yet what we know about the major problems at the
MTA are due to one reporter at The New York Times, one policy analyst at The
Manhattan Institute and one policy analyst at the CBC. All that we know about
the signal problems, the infrastructure crumbling, high labor costs and also the
shift from maintenance and good repair work to these mega projects that do
nothing to serve current consumers of the subway system and have basically
come at the expense of state of good repair work, the crumbling subways. All of
that we know from the New York Times, CBC and Amand. None of that we know
from DiNapoli, who has audited the MTA 61 times and found none of the major
problems that are wrong with the MTA. He is the one Albany politician
responsible for finding out what's wrong with our infrastructure at the MTA
before things start to break.
K. Comptroller DiNapoli, first if you want to respond on the MTA but also...
Well there's so much of what John says, yeah, so much of what John says is plain
wrong and there's not the time in this format to answer all of his crazy notions.
So we don't spend six billion dollars on hedge fund fees, that's just a minor
The audit power is a very important part of the responsibility and we have a
professional audit team. Our auditors are civil service people, they're CPA's,
they're trained auditors, they have professional credentials that they have to
adhere to, they're peer reviewed. They work with me and I appreciate Mark's
acknowledging some of our audit work and we appreciated your suggestion on
some of that work. And they look for high risk areas, certainly in terms of
Medicaid where we've had significant opportunities for cost recovery and
MTA, just read the audits. We put them online. That issue of signals, we
identified that in 2016, before New York Times or anybody else was writing
about that. So, the MTA is another very important high impact area. We have a
number of audits under way now, we want to do more there. With the
authorities though just as would state agencies, the ultimate responsibility
would be with the authorities, with the board members who are appointed to
be the leaders, with the state agencies, with the commissioners and with the
executive departments. The strength of our audits is the credibility of the work
that we do. And many cases we've effectuated change, in many cases when you
read the response to our audits, an agency will say, well we're already doing
that. Well they're doing that because we knocked on the door and we came in
and we started looking. We've saved taxpayers money through our audit work
and local governments were very often the only entity out there providing that
independent review on local finances.
Reading through, just a quick follow-up, reading through a lot of the audits that
your office has done. It seems as though, and this can of course be valuable, but
a lot of them take a look at small pieces of an agency or a program. Is there
room for doing more broad audits of, for instance, the MTA, more broadly but
also of a state agency?
Well particularly with MTA we've done about 30 reports which take the board a
look, financial condition reports. That do look at the big issues and the big
questions and those reports over the years have repeatedly pointed out the
need for the various funding partners to step up to the plate.
The inadequacy of the funding for The Capitol Program. We have taken that big
view and right now we have a number of audits under way with the MTA
because everybody understands, it is at a crisis point and it is at a point where
everyone is focused. But certainly going in to next year's session, one of the
biggest pieces is the legislature has to work together with the Governor, come
up with additional revenue stream, that is essential. And we will continue our audits to see that the MTA keeps on track with this. So we action plan with a fast forward planned but so much of it gets back to having the money to do the proper repairs and re-investment in the infrastructure. We've been sounding the alarm on that for years, if it's not always listened to, well maybe it's time people looked at our reports that go back over the past decade and see that we've been tracking, very carefully, the gaps in the MTA as we do with other state agencies and other public authorities.
So moving on to our next question in other major responsibility of the role. We're actually coming to start with you again here, Comptroller DiNapoli, after this question we will move into our cross examination round. So you can prepare your question for one of your opponents then. But first, one more question on the role of the comptroller, and we start with you Comptroller DiNapoli, budget oversight and evaluating the state budget, how have you approached that? How would you approach it differently in another term? And have you done enough to keep state finances and the state budget process where it should be, is there enough transparency? Have you looked at the issued of debt and the lack of savings in a way that has helped the state's fiscal picture?
Well you have mentioned several topics we've sounded the alarm on. Ultimately though the budget is passed by the legislature and approved by the governor. After being initially proposed by the governor. So, our role is one of lending a voice and what we've tried to do with our budget reports and what we'll continue to do is not only focus on the short term but on the long term. And that's where we see concern.
Out year budget gaps approaching 18 billion dollars over the next few years, not putting enough money aside for our rainy day funds has been an issue that we've identified over the past three or four years particularly. Heavy reliance on lump sum appropriations without any clear definition of how the money is going to be spent. But, we have our voice and I think it's been a strong voice and a number of legislators have echoed the concerns we've identified. But ultimately it is the responsibility of the legislature and the governor to make sure that these issues are addressed. We're gonna continue to be aggressive with our voice and I hope that that will result in some more changes. We have specific proposals on reforming debt in the states, some of which require statutory changes, some of which require constitutional changes. We're gonna continue to sound the alarm. We have the Billy Pulpit, we're gonna continue to use that ultimately much of this rests with the legislature and the governor.
Okay. Mr. Dunlea, how would you approach the budget oversight role of the comptroller?
I would be more aggressive on the budget oversight. There's so many number
reforms, with respect to clean, contract in oversight of the authority, some of
which Tom has proposed but really need to be enacted.
I would use the certification power of pass a little bit more aggressively. One
concern is the state keeps on passing state budgets that fail to comply with
existing court orders on a level of finance and for schools particularly in low
income, in rural communities. I think the comptroller's office should talk more
about tax fairness, one of the things I asked the comptroller's office to do was
examine how much money the state would save if we went to a state single
pairs system. The state comptroller's responsible for monitoring the tax gap, I
oppose the tax gap. I think we should go back to Section 54 of the State Finance
Law, which shares 8% of the state revenues with local government. I think that
would be a lot more effective in terms we do some local property taxes and
increase in the fiscal health. A lot of the towns and cities in the state are on
fiscal stress and we gotta really crack down on the authorities. The authorities
are out of control. I think it's 56 billion dollars of debt they've incurred, largely in
my opinion in circumvention of the state constitution.
Okay, Mr. Gallaudet, the budget oversight powers of the roll, how would you
I guess I would like to say that any viewer who is tuning in right now and their
eyes are glazing over at all the intricate details we're going over. Consider the
current system of this duopoly called the Democrats and the Republicans. They
battle each other, we've got one pit bull over here, we got the existing
comptroller defending himself, that I see is what is broken about our
government. Both on the state level and the national level so if you want to end
the duopoly, consider Libertarians. I think we are the one party that has a
chance becoming a major third party. In New York...
Okay, I think we've heard that message.
No, no I want to continue. Google Larry Sharp, he's running for the governor
position, he is the head of our ticket, if you really wanna get in depth on what
our views are and I'll comment further on it.
okay, thank you. And Mr. Trichter on the budget oversight powers?
So, just to be clear, the comptroller has paid six billion dollars to hedge fund
managers and private equity fund manager over the course of his ten year. That
is an empirical fact and I calculated it. He spent one billion or paid one billion to
them just in fiscal year 2018.
On the budget certification power, I mentioned when I started that this office is
tremendously powerful and under utilized. One particular area is in budget
certification. It's the comptroller's, within the comptroller's authority to refuse
certifying the budget each and every year. And I would use the refusal to
certification as leverage, to negotiate a much better budget and fix the
dysfunctional budget process that we currently have, which are three men in a
room. I would force my way into the room, make it four men. Better than that, I
would open up the process to public view, using the leverage of certification.
The budget is notoriously an awful document, the big ugly, they call it.
In 2019 it included a three million dollar expenditure for a golf tournament, it
included one hundred thousand dollars for tourism to the impoverished New
York locality known as East Hampton. Guess what? This comptroller certified the
budget. In 2016 it was so late it landed on law makers desks in the wee hours of
the morning and the comptroller himself said it's too late for us to analyze.
Guess what? He certified it anyway. In 2014, it included so much pork it was
called the porkiest juice pork thing budget that was ever passed since The Great
Recession, it included 750 million dollars in pork that was unaccounted for. This
comptroller pointed that out and then he certified it anyway.
I would refuse to certify any budget like that, I would take my pen and go home.
I have a much more robust view of how to use this office.
K, coming to you comptroller.
The Saudi Prince. He's making things up as he goes along. The comptroller has
no authority to certify the budget, there is no statutory constitutional authority
for us to do that. You can't make up law, there is no certification of the state
Section one, article five of the state constitution.
The only thing that we do is that we verify that the appropriation bills, which
newfound Republican friends have passed as well, that they have been enacted
so that government can continue. And that's tied to the issue of the reform of if
the budget bills aren't passed, the legislatures don't get paid. It's not a
certification the budget, it is not approving expenditures, that is the
responsibility of the legislature and the governor. And if you're gonna try to
assert an authority that you don't have, well all you're gonna do is gum up the
works and create more gridlock than we have already, you're gonna end up in
court, there is no certification… for the state comptroller.
Yeah, your state… in 1971...
Posner versus Levin...
This is actually, you're gonna have an opportunity to ask one of your opponents
a question. We're gonna keep the question short, not speeches and then a
question so I'll jump in if I need to but we're actually gonna start with you Mr.
Gallaudet with the opportunity to ask one of your opponents a brief question
and then we'll keep the answers. We're not gonna go back and forth, we'll keep
the answers brief but it's your opportunity to raise something perhaps that has
not been raised yet in our debate.
Okay, I guess I would ask the Republican candidate, how do you justify anybody
voting for you? We all know that Mr. DiNapoli's gonna win this race. The polls,
I'm not saying the fate are complete but pretty dead certain. Why should the
voter waste their vote on the Republican party? Especially in New York, my
suggestion would be vote Libertarian.
Okay, question you Mr. Trichter.
Because I'm a professional, I'm not rotting as an ideal lag or a party guy, I'm
running as a guy with the right private sector skills for the job. I also think they
should vote for me because this comptroller has used the powers of the office
to protect the status quo fiscally which we've discussed a little bit today. But
also, culturally. He's brought the powers of the office to bare to protect his
friends and his allies who voted him into office over the objection of every
editorial board in New York State in ways that are problematic and I will save
one of those ways for my question for the Comptroller DiNapoli when it's my
It is your turn.
Mr. Comptroller, in 2011 your close friend and political ally…
Vito Lopez, sexually harassed two female staffers. Your office helped negotiate a
secret settlement with those staffers that included a gag order over the
objections of the victims and then you used tax payer dollars as hush money to
cover up that harassment. That allowed your close friend..
Ask the question please.
And political ally, Vito Lopez, to continue hiring female staffers and harass them.
This all blew up and there were two...
Ask the question please.
Ask the question please.
And your office was found culpable for much of this. You have never apologized
Mr. Comptroller, will you apologize now for any role in that cover-up?
Well, the question again is full of all kinds of inaccuracies which is the consistent
pattern of Jonathan Trichter. My office was not involved in the negotiation of
that settlement, our office plays the role of payments, we do about 145,000
payments a day and it was entered into the electronic payment system.
Our office was consulted for any tax consequences that would come out of that
but our role is a very minor role in payments of any settlements and there are
many that happen on a regular basis for the state. In the aftermath of what
happened, and look let's not lose sight, women were victimized, they were
entitled to some justice and entitled to compensation. That was the agreement,
we made sure that they were paid, there was no secret payment, we have no
secret payments, all payments are public.
And in the aftermath of what happened with the Lopez situation we did
institute changes, more transparency, more accountability, requiring any agency
not just the legislature, if there is a settlement involving an elected state official,
that had to be duly noted, a more clear certification by whatever entity
legislature or a state agency. That in fact, there was a complete review that it
was a legal process and of course we've all evolved governmentally on this
issue, we now have the New York State a new sexual harassment statute
requiring broad compliance with public entities, with private entities as well.
So that question just overloads misinformation, misstatement of facts about my
offices role in that matter and I think the changes that we instituted in the
aftermath of the Lopez case were positive and responsive. We all need to create
a workplace that is free of sexual harassment.
It is your turn to ask a question of one of your opponents.
I feel, Mr. Gallaudet, I'm glad he's here at the debate he's gotten the least
attention in this campaign of all of us. And I'd like to just give you the chance to
speak a little bit more about your vision for the office and why you're running.
'Cause I don't think you've gotten enough attention from the press or the
broader public so, just an opened ended...make your pitch.
Maybe by mentioning that Mr. DiNapoli was a near guaranteed to win, you
earned yourself a few more seconds here to discuss your campaign.
Well, that's part of the problem, he is almost guaranteed to win in the state of
New York because it is so Democrat influenced. Voters typically vote Democrat.
So, yeah, no I, as I said, I'm here to promote the Libertarian ticket overall. And
again I think the reason is that we want to end this duopoly of this constant
bickering back and forth, it's just what government has been reduced to. I think
the people are sick of it, the last election, the Presidential Election, we almost,
there was certainly a call for another candidate that could rise and challenge
Trump and Clinton who nobody seemed to like. And again I would say; one,
google Larry Sharp, I think he's a man that's going places, two, think about your
vote, carefully vote. What are you really trying to accomplish? How can you best
vote to achieve change? And again, I would argue that, especially in the state of
New York, if you vote Libertarian, you will have more chance of affecting change
than if you voted say, Republican or Independent or even the green party.
Okay. And Mr. Dunlea, your opportunity to ask an opponent a question.
So I have a question for Tom. Vicki Fuller who is the chief investment officer of
the comptroller's office, recently left and took a position on the board of the
Williams Company and a number of the climate change… are
quite concerned about the appearance of a conflict of interest and I know that
they have filed a request for investigation of… which
Your question please.
So, the question is, how do you take steps in the future to provide a level of
comfort to tax payers that we don't have people in those positions which may in
fact be looking for a golden parachute on their exit based on their work as a
chief investment officer?
Well, we're 209 billion funders you know. We're invested in virtually every
public company that's out there. So, had Ms. Fuller retired and decided to flip
hamburgers at McDonald's would that had been a conflict because we have
McDonald's stock. So, I think you have to look at some of this in the context of
reality. Ms. Fuller announced that she was retiring and leaving the system. As
such, she is entitled to live her own life. She is though, bound by the ethics
requirement, so there's a two year bar on her doing any business with the fund,
I don't know that as a board of director member that she would have any
business with the fund anyway. But, she's covered by that as well. She's an
experienced investor, she's an African American woman, that's a category very
underrepresented on corporate boards. Probably no surprise that when she
announced her retirement there would be some boards would be interested in
her service. There may be more boards down the road, but that is her life, those
are her choices. The investment decisions that were made in the past were
made on the merits of the investment decisions, not based on any expectation
of future employment.
Do you have any sense, just to quickly follow up on that, it's obviously been in
the news a bit, do you have any sense that she had direct involvement in
choosing to buy debt of the company that she then joined the board of
As I understood, the debt purchase was in 2015, it was three years before so I
don't know if people are making the allegation that the fixed income group that
made the recommendation to do that. It didn't come from Vicki, that the fact
that that happened was somehow tied to Vicki getting a board appointment
three years later, if that's what people are alleging there might be some facts
that they need to report to the proper authorities. But to just create a
conspiracy theory, putting all that together, most of the investments in that
company were through the index funds. Passive. They were there before Vicki
came there, they're there now that she's left. So this notion that she was
directing investment to this company, I think it's an overstatement of the
reality, as chief investment officer she obviously presides over the entire fund.
But that doesn't mean that she was directing these investments so that she
would get a board position years later.
Okay. So we're through the cross examination round, we've got a few more
questions in a lightning round of questions before we go to closing statements.
But a couple more questions on the role of the comptroller and state finances.
And we're gonna start with you here, Mr. Dunlea. The state has tens of billions
of dollars of outstanding debt, hundreds of billions of who include authority
debt that has been accrued and there are also post employment benefit debts,
OPEB debt that increases that amount that are not necessarily covered or
prepared for. What would you do about the positioning of debt around the
state if you're elected comptroller?
Well I'd say I've been very opposed to the level of debt that the state
has incurred. There's a state constitution requirement that debt incurred by the
state's supposed to be approved by the taxpayers and under Robert Moses we
came up at this legal fiction of authorities to circumvent that as I mentioned
when Erastus Corning who is mayor of the city of Albany basically built the
Empire State Plaza and leased it to Rockefeller to circumvent that debt
… which I helped start and was on the board, sue them on
that. How you now curbed that level of debt and cut it back is a big challenge.
Us who need to stop incurring debt, I think we have to reign in the authorities,
there's been a lot of legislation that's been introduced to make the authorities
more transparent. They need to really begin to follow the rules that other state
agencies occur. There's a… management company, a non-
profit that is being used to circumvent even the limit of restrictions on the
authorities. But I think we have to really cut back on debt, how best you do that,
that's why I got 2700 employees gonna be working on that once I'm elected.
Okay, Mr. Gallaudet.
I have no silver bullet, no easy answers on how to tackle this issue. What I can
guarantee you is that if you continue to vote for either a Democrat or a
Republican, nothing will change. Nothing. Again it's why I suggest you look at
the Libertarian ticket as a way to create a third party that'll challenge the
duopoly that we have in the state and the country.
Okay, Mr. Trichter on this issue of debt, what would you do to either reign it in
or make systemic adjustments?
Yeah, I do have a silver bullet or a magic solution to all of this. This office is
tremendously powerful, in 2017 the comptroller issued a debt report where he
claimed a crushing debt burden on a process called Back Door Borrowing. Well it
turns out, what he didn't report was that the comptroller himself has to sign off
on most backdoor borrowing in your state. And I know this because as a public
finance banker when I was underwriting bonds, we had to get sign off whenever
we did bond deals or they wouldn't close, and we had to get the sign off from
the comptroller's office.
The comptroller has signed off on 32 billion dollars on backdoor debts since he's
been in office in 2007 and if he refused to sign off on back door debt, he could
unilaterally end the process once and for all. And institute his own debt policy,
this is something he absolutely has the authority to do. Good government
groups, policy wonks have been wrestling their hands and scratching their heads
on how to fix this problem for decades. The comptroller himself shares the goal,
he recommended a constitutional amendment to end back door debt. I'm telling
you, he could do it himself, if he just refuses to sign off on the debt deals.
So I've heard you have the difference of opinion on this. We're gonna move to
you, Comptroller DiNapoli. If you want to explain, Mr. Trichter actually seems to
have put your idea forward in terms of that you think it needs a constitutional
amendment, but if you want to capture that a little bit further and then talk
about in another term what you might push or do about the state debt.
Sure, well I'm glad we have an area of agreement. Again, you can't create
authority or powers that you don't have. So, we do have the opportunity for
some of the debt, for negotiated debt sales, ones that are competitively
32 billion in negotiations that you signed off on..
Do not go through our office, with a negotiated debt...
We in fact do push back on terms and conditions, we've done that...
Signed off on 32 billion dollars.
Mr. Trichter. Please, please.
Can I continue?
Thank you. We've done that with MTA debt, we've done that with…
debt, we've done that with various public authority debt across the
state. And we have in fact gotten better terms that benefit tax payers and result
in a more responsible management of debt. But again, it is not our authority nor
should it be our role to just stop the debt that happens in the state. We're
concerned about the Subways and MTA Infrastructure Investment, are we just
gonna stop the construction projects because we wanna make a point about too
much debt, no. We have a limited role but it's a role that we've exercised very
fully and I would like to see a constitutional prohibition on backdoor borrowing.
I agree with Mark. It really should go back to I think the implication of what you
were saying is that we should go back to the voters improving the debt. That
really is the ultimate check on having too much debt, we've sounded the alarm
in that repeatedly, we've argued for stopping the backdoor borrowing by
changing the laws in the state in the constitution and returning to voter
And when you say you have pushed back on some of the debt that's been
issued, can you give an example of that? Something specific.
MTA debt, we issued a report in 2010 that had three or four specific examples.
MTA and a couple other authorities. 2014, 2015, 2016, that's all part of the
process. We don't just rubber stamp what comes before us, our staff reviews
the terms and conditions and we push back on the term, on making sure there's
a smarter management that will benefit tax payers, we don't like long duration,
we like a level debt payment structure. We're always pushing back on that and
we've had a number of successes. But we don't approach it by stopping and
saying no, you can't do any debt because we understand that they're very often
important purposes that are behind that debt but we need to restructure the
whole way we look at it. I'm glad you mentioned OPEB, we pushed for the state
to set up the opportunity for an OPEB trust of the post employment benefits...
Ten seconds please.
We don't do a good job of that in the state, we now have the opportunity. The
legislature needs to appropriate money to that as New York City has done, that
is a big cost item that's looming as part of our financial risk down the road.
So before we move into a quick lightening round and then closing statements
the last more substantive question is related to the federal tax reforms and
what New York should or should not do. If you have an idea from the perch of
comptroller, if you ascend to that position or you keep that position, are there
things that New York should be doing in relation to the federal tax reforms that
were passed at the end of 2017 into this year that New York finances are of
concern to many tax payers. Mr. Trichter, what's that mean?
Yeah, so I try to stick to the role of the comptroller when it comes to running for
this office and I've tried to be substantive and stay away from issues that are
outside of my lane and that's one issue that's potentially outside of my lane and
so I haven't really discussed it. I could tell you a little bit about it but, or I can
talk to you about it from a personal level, but first let me also just target
something that the comptroller said about his oversight and review role of MTA
debt which he stressed in his answer when I pointed out that he has the
authority to unilaterally end backdoor borrowing.
He pointed out that he reviews the terms of the debt so the New York Times
discovered that the MTA was paying a fee to the state whenever it issued debt.
Over 325, it was about 328 million dollars worth over the course of the times
the Times discovered. The state was basically milking the MTA of funds that it
could have used for infrastructure maintenance to prevent the crumbling assets
that it currently has. Indeed the comptroller reviewed all of that debt and he
never noticed that fee when the division of budget was told about it or when it
was discovered, the governor and the division of budget was embarrassed and
they said they would stop it. DiNapoli signed off on all of those debt deals and
he, according to his own words, reviewed all of the fees and the structures
connected to that debt.
Okay, I'm gonna give you a chance to answer that and then we can move into
your thoughts on tax reform.
Sure, there he goes again. To quote someone, it's a statutory thing, it's
statutory. We pointed out that that's an issue and suggested that there be
changes in statute but you can't make your own laws John as you go along...
You can unilaterally refuse to sign off, you could have pointed it out. The New
York Times discovered it Tom, not you.
It's a statutory requirement. We follow laws.
We're not gonna go back and forth.
We follow the laws of the state, that's the important role of being the
There's no law that prevents you...
So why don't you move into any thoughts you have about what the state might
need to do on tax reform.
I give the government legislature credit for trying to come up with some options
to have people setting up these childhood trusts as a way to pay for education
and healthcare costs. There's a way to get around the cap on state local tax
deductibility. The obvious problem is the IRS has poured cold water on that. So I
think that it is an area that we have to continue to look at if there are other
ways, I mean certainly in the short run it means for government at every level,
gonna have to work even harder to control costs because some of the benefit
that we had with the deductibility is now capped at ten thousand dollars.
So, I think it makes our audit work even more important and I think the other thing we have to do is really, and it's too soon to tell, what would be the impact on tax payers in New York? Will we in fact see a flight out of the state because of this. I know many people concerned about the higher income New Yorkers that pay a higher proportion of the state income tax. I'm also worried about the middle class families. The folks that don't have that second home in Florida they could switch their address to. I live on Long Island, ten thousand dollars in property taxes alone is a modest property tax bill. So there are implications of the federal taxes that are very concerting in the short run and the long run, if they're gonna cut federal programs to pay for that tax cut. New York is gonna be hurt again.
Okay. Mr. Dunlea.
I admit to be pretty skeptical about the value these charitable trusts that the governor talked about and what in fact, who would benefit from them. I happened to be the press secretary for Howie Hawkins who's a Green Party candidate for governor, we have certainly articulated that since this huge tax cut was supposed to result in higher wages for workers and reinvestment in businesses and that has not occurred. We have supported trying to recapture say, ten billion dollars of that tax giveaway and reinvest that in New York like was supposed to be done. One tax issue that I have been supportive of, I should have mentioned earlier, is the carbon tax. It'd be best done at a federal level but basically hold corporate polluters responsible for the damage caused by burning fossil fuels and climate change. If this federal government's unlikely to do that I support enact of a state carbon tax.
Okay and Mr. Gallaudet.
One area I might agree on with the Green Party I for one would like to get rid of the income tax in New York State, I'd like to get rid of the federal income tax, a tax on income is a tax on productivity. It's one of the dumbest ideas man has ever come up with. But that being said, that's one of our Libertarian principles. If you have to tax something, tax something you don't want. You don't want to have… carbon, so I've been a long advocate of replacing say a corporate income tax with a corporate carbon tax. Get rid of the income tax on individuals, we don't need it, it's intrusive. In fact I have an October 15th deadline right now, this week I'm spending just about the whole week getting this tax thing done. So that would be my answer.
Okay, we're gonna move into just a few quick yes or no questions and then closing statements. We're gonna start with you for the first question and change it up a bit. Comptroller DiNapoli, so yes or no or very very short answer to these questions. The state so-called millionaire's tax that's set to expire I believe next year, should it stay and should it be raised additionally as some are calling for?
Well we need the revenue, it's up to the legislation to decide it so in the
absence of other revenue my expectation would be it would probably be
Increase it, raise it.
Mr. Gallaudet. We heard your take on taxes yes...
We need the revenue. This is with the same old times, again, if you want things
to stay the same vote for the Dems and Repubs.
Understood, Mr. Trichter.
No, we already rely on personal income tax way too much, forty percent of the
personal income tax comes through the millionaires, the are very mobile
people. They can move to Florida.
Let it expire. Okay, Mr. Dunlea, starting with you. Should the statewide
minimum wage be fifteen dollars per hour?
Okay, Mr Gallaudet.
In principal I'm against minimum wage laws but practically, yeah. Maybe
somewhere between the fifteen and twenty dollars.
Okay, Mr. Trichter.
No, it's hurting upstate farmers, it hurts fast food industries, I'm a free markets
Okay. Mr. DiNapoli.
Okay, starting with you, Mr. Gallaudet. Do you believe there should be a
congestion pricing scheme put into place for New York City?
I'm not totally against it. I'd have to look at the details.
Okay, Mr. Trichter.
Ben, really the comptroller's got a lot of powers and you're asking lightning
questions that have nothing to do with the comptroller's office.
I think these are issues that some voters might want to know, related to
I'm running for New York State Comptroller. It has no relation to the office.
Okay, no answer on that. Okay. Comptroller DiNapoli?
It's probably the most likely solution to the question of what will be the
additional revenue source for the MTA, again that's for others to decide that,
not the comptroller. But, we need something and that seems to be the one with
the board of support.
Okay, Mr. Dunlea.
Yes, with the possible exception, reduction for zero emission vehicles.
Okay, and starting with you Mr. Trichter. Should the so called LLC loophole in
campaign finance be closed?
Yes, along with exceptions for public sector labor entities and plaintiffs
attorneys securities class action plan...
Yes, we need public financing of campaigns to level the playing field and have
Yes, we need clean money elections based on the Arizona and main model, full
Starting with you Comptroller DiNapoli. Should the state pass single payer
Better done at the federal level, but yes.
We'd require raising the top income tax bracket in New York State to 27.5%. It
would kill New York State.
I'll take that as a no.
Mr. Dunlea, last couple here. Should there be public hearings in Albany related
to sexual harassment both in government and the private sector?
I'm not sure.
Sorry, I'm still stuck on the single payer healthcare system in New York State. It's
just an economic disaster for New York. What was the question, Ben?
The question is, do you think there should be public hearings as some advocates
and former victims have called for around sexual harassment in state
government and the private sector?
I'm sorry I missed that. I also think we should go after politicians who covered
up episodes of sexual harassment.
Yes to hearings?
Well we have the new law now so I think as a follow up to that new law,
hearings would make sense to see how it's being complied with.
Okay, and last two, Mr. Dunlea starting with you. Should the state continue the
ban on fracking and add to it a ban on fracking infrastructure? I think we know
where you stand on this, but give you a chance to answer.
Yes, and not spend eighty eight million dollars of tax dollars to build a frack
… turbine for…
We should be allowed to frack just like Pennsylvania, the southern tier is hurting
Again, that's… to decide but my own personal opinion would
be yes, continue the ban on fracking.
Okay, and last one starting with you Mr. Gallaudet. Should the joint commission
on public ethics, a state ethics watch dog, should that entity be scrapped in
favor of something brand new that's more independent from the governor and
I have no thoughts on that.
No thoughts on that. Mr. Trichter.
And Mr. Dunlea.
Okay, so we're gonna move into closing statements. We're gonna start with you
Mr. Trichter and actually work toward my left here. You have a minute to talk to
voters and give them your push for why they should vote for you on November
Thanks, Ben. So I've tried to run for comptroller based on substance, not party,
not ideology. And I just find it challenging when I put forth data and substance
of ideas and facts that the current comptroller is able to basically call lies. It's
just not true and I just don't know where to begin.
For one thing, he says budget certification isn't a responsibility of the
comptroller, in fact the New York State Supreme Court ruled 1971, Pozzner vs
Levin, that the comptroller may have standing to test the validity of state
budgets but is not obligated to do so. Now I seize on the first part of that ruling,
which says the comptroller may have standing to test the validity of the state
budget and I would. I would take my pen and go home. I would litigate it and I
would test it. This comptroller takes the second part of that ruling, he's not
obligated to do so and prefers to basically duck and cover.
Well, the office of the state comptroller is the chief fiscal officer and top watch
dog. Yes, I'm a bit of a pit bull. Yes, I would bark. That's what the job calls for. It
calls for bringing accountability and scrutiny, an independent outsider to all of
what's wrong in Albany. It can single handedly fix so many of the vexing fiscal
problems of New York State if it had somebody willing to disrupt the status quo
for the good and ordinary New Yorkers. That's how I would approach the office,
and it's very different from how this comptroller has run the office.
Thank you, Mr. Gallaudet coming to you for a closing statement.
Yes, again my general theme here is to vote carefully. Don't waste your vote.
The state of New York is a place where I think a vibrant third party would be a
huge asset, not only to the state but to the nation. One of the reasons I sort of
got back into politics is the last election, the Libertarian Party got 3.6% of the
national vote in the Presidential Election. If we had gotten 5% that would have
given us third party status according to the government, federal government.
We would have received funds once we hit third, not that I'm in favor of
government doling out funds to parties but we'll take what we can get. New
York single handedly could have pushed that vote over 5% if people in New
York, instead of voting Independent and voting Republican, they thought about
it, that's a waste. Especially in the Presidential Election. So, I'm asking people to
carefully consider where they place their vote. If they vote Independent or if
they vote for the Republican, most likely going to lose. The vote for the
Democrat, they're gonna vote for the Democrat anyway but if you're on the
fence, consider carefully the strategy of ending the duopoly in New York and in
Thank you. Mr. Dunlea.
I'm Mark Dunlea and I'm the Green Party candidate for State Comptroller. I've
spent 45 years of my life fighting for open government, more transparency,
more responsible treatment of our tax dollars. I think I can do a good job as a
State Comptroller. But I'm running on the issue of the best in the state pension
funds from fossil fuels. I do think we need a green to watch the greens. One of
the big criticisms of Tom is that he's the nicest guy in Albany and that may not
be what we need in terms of trying to crack down on the corruption. When the
New York Times devote an entire edition of their magazine to the proposition
that the world is doomed because we lack the political will to move to 100%
clean energy as rapidly as possible and to stop fossil fuels, we need all hands on
deck. Divesting is a very small, simple step but if Tom DiNapoli does that, he's
gonna be a world class hero on climate change and if I convince him during this
campaign to divest then my campaign will have been successful.
Thank you, and Comptroller DiNapoli your closing statement.
I'm very proud to already be a world class hero in terms of how our pension fund deals with the climate issue and if a reputation of being nice means that I treat people with respect and with openness, I'll take that. That's how I was raised and I'm too old to change.
I'm very proud of the work that I've done in State Comptroller for the past, I guess going on 12 years now. I inherited an office that was mired in scandal, unfortunately my predecessor ended up in prison, I have to restore the integrity and the value of the office and then we were faced with the Global Financial Crisis in the Great Recession. Well I've navigated through tough times. I've used the bully pulpit of this office to call for important reforms on state spending, fiscal and budget practices. I have used the order of authority to look out for the tax payer interest at the state level and the local level. And the 1.1 million New Yorkers and their families who depend on the strength of our pension fund can rest easy at night because we have a 98% funded pension plan. And we're doing smart things with our investments, we're a very active and engaged shareholder moving corporations to do the right thing. There's a lot of work to do in New York, including returning your lost money through unclaimed funds.
But I have a record that I'm very, very proud of. I have a team of professionals that do the job each and every day with a great deal of belief in the mission of the comptroller's office, very proud to be running on five lines; Democrat, working families, Independents, the Reform Party and the Women's Equality Party. I have that kind of support and a lot of editorial support as well. I think by election day, because I'm doing the job in the right way. A lot of folks have come and gone over the past few years, Tom DiNapoli continues to be on the job. My only boss, the people of the State of New York. I hope I've earned your vote once again.
Thank you and thank you all for being here and participating in this debate today.